Enabling DAOS on a database – new recommendation

February 5, 2010 – 8:45 am

Almost one year ago, I wrote about “How To Wast Space” when enabling DAOS on an application. And I assumed that it might not be sure that the compact task will always do the recompress BEFORE the attachments are moved to the DAOS repository.

The recommended way to enable DAOS on an application and recompress attachments was:

  1. load compact  mail\example.nsf  -c -ZU -DAOS ON

According to IBM technote #1411563, the new recommendation is to perform 2 compacts.

First, enable compression and then enable DAOS.  This is critical for customers which have upgraded from 6.5x to 8.5

  1. load compact  mail\example.nsf -c -ZU
  2. load compact  mail\example.nsf -c -DAOS ON

If you want to get the most out of DAOS, this is the way to do it.

btw. the IBM technote obviously has a typo. See the mistake?

Related posts:

  1. BLUG meeting and a DAOS problem
  2. DAOS enhancement in 8.5.2
  3. DAOS: Problem with SoftDeletion
  4. DAOS: Transaction Protocol Trap
  5. Instance member…does not exist’ when enabling Out Of Office

  1. 4 Responses to “Enabling DAOS on a database – new recommendation”

  2. Yes,
    they missed the “On”. :-)
    By the way, what would you recommend about switching the Data- and Design-Compressing on (During the first or during the second task)?

    By Harald Wolf on Feb 5, 2010

  3. Well, I would add a third step.
    load compact mail\example.nsf -c -n -v
    before or after the
    load compact mail\example.nsf -c -ZU

    By Ulrich Krause on Feb 5, 2010

  4. The -n -v can be added to the second compact that is doing the -daos on. The reason we recommend splitting the -ZU out to its own compact is that the performance is actually better to do the LZ1 compression by itself before storing objects in DAOS. The design/data compression will perform the same whether you bundle them with DAOS enablement or not.

    By Jon Champlin on Feb 5, 2010

  5. Jon, what type of performance are we talking about here?

    By Darren Duke on Feb 6, 2010

Sorry, comments for this entry are closed at this time.